Source1: artifact
1. picture of the source
2. Brief description of source
This is the picture of my dad at the graduation ceremony from University of Minnesota with me. This ceremony was significant because this was the final step of my dad' s PHD and my dad's PHD was the major reason why I was born in US and due to that I had the opportunity to enter KIS.
3. Source type
It is a secondary source because it is not much as important as the interview.
4.Short explanation of the source's significance to the event.
This source, picture, is very significant because I am in the picture which means that I was born in US during my dad's PHD. Therefore, due to this event, I still have the American citizenship and that provided me an opportunity to enter KIS.
5. Written or oral (e.g. podcast) recount of the event with direct reference to all of the sources.
This relates to other sources in the way of showing the imagery of it. Even though I don't remember the things that happened that day, the point is that I was born at that point and I attended the ceremony.
Source2: document
1.Picture of source
2.Brief description of source
This is the original copy of my dad's graduate certificate. I took the picture of the document because obviously I couldn't find it on the web, and I couldn't find how to export this document into my computer.
3.Source type (primary or secondary)
This document is a secondary source.
4.Short explanation of the source’s significance to the event
This document is more than significant because it proves that my dad had graduated from University of Minnesota achieving his doctors degree. The picture like the one I posted above can be faked by any people who wants to pretend to be a graduate from University of Minnesota. (Of course the picture is not fake, and it was actually taken at the graduation ceremony.) I believe(and also hope) that this is the strongest evidence that proves my dad's doctors degree. Therefore, this is a very significant source.
5.Written or oral (e.g. podcast) recount of the event with direct reference to all of the sources
This document is obviously within the direct reference to my dad's PHD in US because this is the document that proves the whole thing.
Source3: Interview
1.Picture of source(I don't have a picture of the interview)
2.Brief description of source
This interview was very astounding to me also because I didn't know that I was sick at the day after I was born. Also according to the interview I realized a lot of facts that I didn't know about me, and my dad in past.
3.Source type(primary or secondary)
Interview is the primary source because my dad was who actually experienced and I heard the stories from him.
4.Short explanation of the source's significance to the event.
This interview was more than significant because I got to know some of the facts that I wasn't familiar to while the facts are about me. Also, I got the chance to recall some of the memories, which I don't remember, by interviewing my dad.
5.Written or oral (e.g. podcast) recount of the event with direct reference to all of the sources.
This interview covers most of the part, basically overall about this project. What my dad said during the interview was related to reasons why he went to US to study, which means why I was born in US. Also, it contained a story about me being sick at the day after I was born.
Hey, why did you put your video on my page?
Time Line of ten events :
Source1: artifact
1. picture of the source
2. Brief description of source
This is the picture of my dad at the graduation ceremony from University of Minnesota with me. This ceremony was significant because this was the final step of my dad' s PHD and my dad's PHD was the major reason why I was born in US and due to that I had the opportunity to enter KIS.
3. Source type
It is a secondary source because it is not much as important as the interview.
4.Short explanation of the source's significance to the event.
This source, picture, is very significant because I am in the picture which means that I was born in US during my dad's PHD. Therefore, due to this event, I still have the American citizenship and that provided me an opportunity to enter KIS.
5. Written or oral (e.g. podcast) recount of the event with direct reference to all of the sources.
This relates to other sources in the way of showing the imagery of it. Even though I don't remember the things that happened that day, the point is that I was born at that point and I attended the ceremony.
Source2: document
1.Picture of source
2.Brief description of source
This is the original copy of my dad's graduate certificate. I took the picture of the document because obviously I couldn't find it on the web, and I couldn't find how to export this document into my computer.
3.Source type (primary or secondary)
This document is a secondary source.
4.Short explanation of the source’s significance to the event
This document is more than significant because it proves that my dad had graduated from University of Minnesota achieving his doctors degree. The picture like the one I posted above can be faked by any people who wants to pretend to be a graduate from University of Minnesota. (Of course the picture is not fake, and it was actually taken at the graduation ceremony.) I believe(and also hope) that this is the strongest evidence that proves my dad's doctors degree. Therefore, this is a very significant source.
5.Written or oral (e.g. podcast) recount of the event with direct reference to all of the sources
This document is obviously within the direct reference to my dad's PHD in US because this is the document that proves the whole thing.
Source3: Interview
1.Picture of source(I don't have a picture of the interview)
2.Brief description of source
This interview was very astounding to me also because I didn't know that I was sick at the day after I was born. Also according to the interview I realized a lot of facts that I didn't know about me, and my dad in past.
3.Source type(primary or secondary)
Interview is the primary source because my dad was who actually experienced and I heard the stories from him.
4.Short explanation of the source's significance to the event.
This interview was more than significant because I got to know some of the facts that I wasn't familiar to while the facts are about me. Also, I got the chance to recall some of the memories, which I don't remember, by interviewing my dad.
5.Written or oral (e.g. podcast) recount of the event with direct reference to all of the sources.
This interview covers most of the part, basically overall about this project. What my dad said during the interview was related to reasons why he went to US to study, which means why I was born in US. Also, it contained a story about me being sick at the day after I was born.